Byrd v. Posey et al
| Jonathan Byrd |
| Erin Posey, A Reische, Ashley Gregory, J Spencer, Sandra Ham, Amber Seymour, Sandra Simpson and . Sheldon |
| 4:2026cv04182 |
| July 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois |
| Michael M Mihm |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Michael M. Mihm on 7/27/2026. Plaintiff has not filed a petition to proceed in forma pauperis nor paid the $405 filing fee. The Clerk is directed to mail to the plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 30 days, plaintiff must either pay the $405 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, along with account statements for the previous six months, or his complaint will be dismissed without prejudice.(SAG)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF CASE OPENING. Please be advised that your case has been assigned to Judge Michael Mihm. Effective immediately, all documents should be mailed or scanned to the Peoria Division,100 NE Monroe Street,Peoria,IL 61602.Merit Review Deadline set for 8/17/2026. (Attachments: #1 Notice Regarding Privacy Issues)(SAG) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jonathan Byrd.(SAG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
