Roche v. Comerica Bk, et al
Patrick R Roche |
Comerica Bank, Eugene Miller, Kathryn Williams, Tamara Gurne, Affina Corp., Gary Drook, Ted Leuken and Mark Colvin |
1:2002cv02055 |
March 20, 2002 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
James F Holderman |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2002. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MINUTE ORDER of 5/9/02 by Hon. James F. Holderman: Comerica Bank defendants and Afina defendants' motions to dismiss the complaint [13-1] [12-1] are moot. See Order dated 4/15/02 [7-2]. Telephoned notice (yap) |
Filing 13 MOTION by defendants Gary Drook, Ted Leuken and Mark Colvin to dismiss the complaint (Attachments); Notice (yap) |
Filing 11 WAIVER of service of summons as to defendants' Ted Leuken, C. Mark Colvin and Gary Drook sent on 3/20/02; Notice. (vmj) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendants' Affina Corp, Gary Drook, Ted Leuken, Mark Colvin by Christina M. Tchen, Michele L. Birkmeier. (vmj) |
Filing 12 MOTION by defendants Tamara Gurne, Comerica Bk, Eugene Miller and Kathryn Williams to dismiss complaint Memorandum of law in Support; Notice (yap) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendants' Comerica Bk, Eugene Miller, Kathryn Williams, Tamara Gurne by Kurt M. Carlson, and Alexander D. Kerr Jr. (vmj) |
Filing 8 WAIVER of service of summons as to defendants' Comerica Bk, Eugene Miller, Kathryn Williams, Tamara Gurne sent on 3/20/02; Notice. (vmj) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER of 4/15/02 by Hon. James F. Holderman: Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is denied [4-1]. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [5-1] is moot. This action is dismissed in its entirety. (See reverse of minute order) terminating case Notices mailed by judge's staff (vmj) |
Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER of 4/12/02 by Hon. James F. Holderman: Plaintiff's motion to reinstate (sic) and amend is granted [3-1,3-2]. Case reopened Even though not in compliance with the requirements of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Local Rules (Northern District of Illinois) as to proper form, the amended complaint signed and dated 4/11/02 may be filed. Mailed notice (vmj) |
Filing 5 MOTION by plaintiff for appointment of counsel . (vmj) |
Filing 4 APPLICATION by plaintiff to proceed without prepayment of fees and affidavit (Attachment). (vmj) |
Filing 3 MOTION by plaintiff to reinstate and amend case (Attachments). (vmj) |
Filing 2 MINUTE ORDER of 4/2/02 by Hon. James F. Holderman: The complaint is dismissed pursuant to Local Rule 83.12. No attorney filed the complaint on behalf of the party plaintiff which is purported to be a corporation. terminating case Mailed notice (vmj) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT; jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Pro Se Appearance by plaintiff (No summons(es) issued.) (Documents: 1-1 through 1-3) (hp) |
RECEIPT regarding payment of filing fee paid; on 3/20/02 in the amount of $150.00, receipt #10313742. (hp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.