SEC v. Black, et al
Case Number: 1:2004cv07377
Filed: November 15, 2004
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
Presiding Judge: William T. Hart
Nature of Suit: Securities/Commodities
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 243 OPINION and Order signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 11/6/2012. (np, )
October 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 236 ENTER OPINION and Order Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 10/9/2012: Mailed notice (jmp, )
July 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 225 MOTION by Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission for judgment , FOR SETTING OF CIVIL PENALTIES AND PREJUDGMENT INTEREST AND ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT CONRAD M. BLACK (Polish, Jonathan)
February 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 214 ENTER OPINION and Order Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 2/21/2012: Mailed notice (jmp, )
April 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 182 ENTER Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 4/30/2009: Mailed notice (jmp, )
September 24, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 166 ENTER Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 9/24/2008: Mailed notice (jmp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SEC v. Black, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?