Young et al v. County of Cook et al
| 1:2006cv00552 |
| January 30, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
923
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 9/20/2017: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion and Order, the Court grants plaintiffs' motion for attorney's fees and incentive awards [dkt. no. 880]. (mk)
|
|
Filing
478
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 9/15/2009:(gcy, )
|
|
Filing
415
MOTION by Defendant Michael Sheahan for judgment Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Gallagher, Daniel)
|
|
Filing
380
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 7/27/2009:(gcy, )
|
|
Filing
298
REVISED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on February 23, 2009 (revised April 2, 2009)(gcy, )
|
|
Filing
278
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/23/2009:(gcy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Young et al v. County of Cook et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
