Witherspoon v. City Of Waukegan
| 1:2006cv07089 |
| December 22, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Ronald A. Guzman |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
212
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 8/22/2012. Mailed notice(cjg, )
|
|
Filing
205
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 3/30/2011. Mailed notice (cjg, )
|
|
Filing
187
MOTION by Defendant City Of Waukegan for judgment Renewed Motion for Judgment As A Matter Of Law On Plaintiff's Retaliation Claim (Peracke, Nicole)
|
|
Filing
178
MOTION by Defendant City Of Waukegan for judgment [CORRECTED DEFENDANT'S RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW ON PLAINTIFF'S RETALIATION CLAIM] (Stephenson, Karen)
|
|
Filing
168
MOTION by Defendant City Of Waukegan for judgment memorandum of law in support of defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff's race discrimination claim (Stephenson, Karen)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Witherspoon v. City Of Waukegan | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
