Quantz Smalll Engine Repair Shoppe v. Vast Consulting and Marketing, LLC et al

Plaintiff: Quantz Smalll Engine Repair Shoppe
Defendant: Vast Consulting and Marketing, LLC and John Does 1-10
Case Number: 1:2007cv02154
Filed: April 18, 2007
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Ruben Castillo
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1442 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Quantz Smalll Engine Repair Shoppe v. Vast Consulting and Marketing, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Quantz Smalll Engine Repair Shoppe
Represented By: James O. Latturner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Vast Consulting and Marketing, LLC
Represented By: Paul Andrew Greenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Represented By: Paul Andrew Greenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?