McCormick v. Loftus et al
Donald McCormick |
Chi. Det. Loftus, Chi. Det. Shedish, John Lanher and Jobaet Pedroza |
1:2007cv03547 |
June 27, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Will |
Joan B. Gottschall |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 111 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 8/20/2012. Defendants' Partial Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 101 is granted. Because Plaintiff's statelaw claims against Defendants Loftus and Shebish are barred by a one-year statute of limitations, the court dismisses Count IV in its entirety. The court also dismisses Count V against Loftus and Shebish insofar as it alleges a civil conspiracy to violate state law. [For further detail see written opinion.] Mailed notice (lw, ). |
Filing 76 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall on 9/7/2011. Defendants' renewed motion to dismiss 72 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 75 is granted. The Court appoints Christina Diane Harrison of Wi lliams Montgomery & John, Ltd., 233 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60606-6359, (312) 443-3200, to represent Plaintiff in accordance with counsel's trial bar obligations under the District Court's Local Rule 83.37. A status hearing is scheduled for 10/4/2011 at 9:30AM. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (lw, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.