Wilson et al v. O'Brien et al
| Robert Wilson |
| James O'Brien, Gerald Carroll, John Halloran, Edward Triggs, Rolston, McInerney, Moser, Graf, Coughlin, Richards, Bonke, William Healy, City of Chicago and County of Cook |
| 1:2007cv03994 |
| July 17, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Charles P. Kocoras |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
304
WRITTEN Opinion signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 7/29/2011: Plaintiff's motion (Doc 259 ) in limine to bar reference to marijuana use is granted. All other pending motions in limine are denied. Hearing on admissibility issues re: testimony and exhibits set for 1/17/2012 at 10:15 a.m. Jury trial set for 1/23/2012 at 10:15 a.m. (For further details see minute order.)Mailed notice(sct, )
|
|
Filing
250
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 2/25/2011.Mailed notice(sct, )
|
|
Filing
163
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 4/6/2010.Mailed notice(sct, )
|
|
Filing
109
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 9/2/2009.Mailed notice(sct, )
|
|
Filing
86
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Martin C. Ashman on 3/20/2009. (cdy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
