Swanigan v. Trotter et al
| Rashad B. Swanigan |
| Trotter, Scott Mulane, Mueller, Reyes, Ramirez, Unknown Number of Unnamed Officers of the Chicago Police Department and City of Chicago |
| 1:2007cv04749 |
| August 22, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Virginia M. Kendall |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
384
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/18/2013: For the reasons set forth, Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration 372 is denied. (For further details see attached Order) Mailed notice(tlp, )
|
|
Filing
371
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 9/14/2012.(tsa, )
|
|
Filing
303
MOTION by Defendants Kevin Anderson, Janice Dillon, Michael Frazier, William Kaupert, Luis Montalvo, Thomas Muehlfelder, Joseph J. Porebski, Robert Trotter for judgment as a matter of law (McGrath, Megan)
|
|
Filing
259
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/14/2011: For the reasons stated, the Court grants in part and denies in part Swanigans Motion for Reconsideration. Status hearing set for 2/17/2011 at 09:00 AM. Entered by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/14/2011.Mailed notice(tsa, )
|
|
Filing
195
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/4/2009:Mailed notice(jms, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
