Jaramillo v. Certegy Check Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Jaime Jaramillo
Defendant: Certegy Check Services, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2007cv05018
Filed: September 6, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Charles R Norgle
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2008. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2008 Filing 36 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr: Case dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) and with each party bearing its own costs and attorney's fees. The status hearing set for 11/5/2008 is stricken. Civil case terminated. Telephoned/mailed notice (ewf, )
October 21, 2008 Filing 35 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Jaime Jaramillo (Rowe, James)
September 8, 2008 Filing 33 NOTICE of Correction regarding #31 . (kj, )
September 5, 2008 Filing 34 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr:Motion by Plaintiff to certify class #6 and for preservation of documents #7 is denied as moot, pursuant to counsel's in-court statements that the parties have reached a settlement "in principle." Counsel represented that the parties are included in a global settlement in the pending Florida litigation, with expected final approval by the Florida court in October 2008. Counsel shall deliver to the Court the appropriate order when the parties have finalized a settlement. Status is set for November 5, 2008 at 10:00 A.M. Mailed notice. (kj, )
September 5, 2008 Filing 32 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Charles R. Norgle, Sr: Status hearing held 9/5/2008. Status hearing is continued to 11/5/2008 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ewf, )
September 5, 2008 Filing 31 Document Entered In Error.(kj, ) Modified on 10/23/2008 (tmh, ). (tmh, ).
February 22, 2008 Filing 30 MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.:Status hearing held on 2/22/2008.Status hearing is continued to 9/5/2008 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice (ewf, )
January 31, 2008 Filing 29 MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.:Status hearing is rescheduled from 2/13/2008 to 2/22/2008 at 9:30 a.m. Telephoned/mailed notice (ewf, )
January 17, 2008 Filing 28 MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.:Motion to stay proceedings pending settlement approval #26 is granted.Mailed notice (tlp, )
January 10, 2008 Filing 27 NOTICE of Motion by Marina C. Santini for presentment of motion to stay #26 before Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr. on 1/18/2008 at 10:30 AM. (Santini, Marina)
January 10, 2008 Filing 26 MOTION by Plaintiff Jaime Jaramillo, Defendant Certegy Check Services, Inc. to stay (Santini, Marina)
January 8, 2008 Filing 25 MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.:Status hearing is set for 2/13/2008 at 9:30 A.M. Mailed notice (ewf, )
January 3, 2008 Filing 24 MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.:Agreed Motion to extend Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Plead #22 is granted. Parties shall comply with F.R.C.P. 26. Discovery cutoff date is set for 7/31/2008. Motions for summary judgment are due on or before 8/15/2008. Telephoned/mailed notice (ewf, )
December 28, 2007 Filing 23 NOTICE of Motion by Marina C. Santini for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer, motion for relief #22 before Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr. on 1/4/2008 at 10:30 AM. (Santini, Marina)
December 28, 2007 Filing 22 MOTION by Defendant Certegy Check Services, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (THIRD AGREED MOTION) (Santini, Marina)
December 7, 2007 Filing 21 MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.:Second Agreed Motion to Extend Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Plead #19 is granted.Telephoned/mailed notice (ewf, )
December 5, 2007 Filing 20 NOTICE of Motion by Marina C. Santini for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer, motion for relief #19 before Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr. on 12/7/2007 at 10:30 AM. (Santini, Marina)
December 5, 2007 Filing 19 SECOND AGREED MOTION by Defendant Certegy Check Services, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 (Santini, Marina) Modified by Clerk's Office on 12/7/2007 (yap, ).
November 9, 2007 Filing 18 MINUTE entry before Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.:Agreed Motion to Extend Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Plead #16 is granted.Mailed notice (ewf, )
November 6, 2007 Filing 17 NOTICE of Motion by Marina C. Santini for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer, motion for relief #16 before Honorable Charles R. Norgle Sr. on 11/9/2007 at 10:30 AM. (Santini, Marina)
November 6, 2007 Filing 16 MOTION by Defendant Certegy Check Services, Inc. for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint #1 Agreed motion (Santini, Marina)
November 6, 2007 Filing 15 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Certegy Check Services, Inc. by Marina C. Santini (Santini, Marina)
October 1, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 14 APPLICATION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Certegy Check Services, Inc. by Mark S. Melodia; Order entered granting leave by Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.. Filing fee $ 50.00 paid, receipt number 10341534. (vcf, )
October 1, 2007 Opinion or Order Filing 13 APPLICATION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Certegy Check Services, Inc. by Paul J. Bond; Order entered granting leave by Judge Charles R. Norgle Sr.. Filing fee $ 50.00 paid, receipt number 10341534. (vcf, )
September 24, 2007 Filing 12 NOTICE of Correction regarding attorney appearance #10 . (air, )
September 24, 2007 Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jaime Jaramillo by James R. Rowe (Rowe, James)
September 24, 2007 Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jaime Jaramillo by James R. Rowe (Rowe, James) Incorrect document linked to entry. Modified on 9/25/2007 (air, ).
September 24, 2007 Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Certegy Check Services, Inc. by David Zev Smith (Smith, David)
September 11, 2007 Filing 8 NOTICE by Jaime Jaramillo re MOTION by Plaintiff Jaime JaramilloPreservation of Documents #7 , MOTION by Plaintiff Jaime Jaramillo to certify class #6 (Drury, Larry)
September 11, 2007 Filing 7 MOTION by Plaintiff Jaime JaramilloPreservation of Documents (Drury, Larry)
September 11, 2007 Filing 6 MOTION by Plaintiff Jaime Jaramillo to certify class (Drury, Larry)
September 6, 2007 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant Certegy Check Services, Inc. (mb, )
September 6, 2007 Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Jaime Jaramillo by Larry Daniel Drury (mb, )
September 6, 2007 Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (mb, )
September 6, 2007 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Jaime Jaramillo; (mb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jaramillo v. Certegy Check Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jaime Jaramillo
Represented By: James R. Rowe
Represented By: Larry D. Drury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Certegy Check Services, Inc.
Represented By: David Zev Smith
Represented By: Marina C. Santini
Represented By: Mark S. Melodia
Represented By: Paul J. Bond
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?