Bethlehem Enterprise Inc. et al v. City of Oak Forest et al
| Bethlehem Enterprise Inc. and Parvati Corp. |
| City of Oak Forest, Steve Jones, Adam Dotson and David Newquist |
| 1:2008cv00702 |
| January 31, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Amy J. St. Eve |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Housing Discrimination |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
457
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 3/20/2012:Mailed notice(kef, )
|
|
Filing
289
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 11/18/2010: The Court, in its discretion, grants the second part of the individual Defendants' motion to quash the subpoena directed at the law firm Ancel Glink. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice(kef, )
|
|
Filing
288
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 11/16/2010: The Court, in its discretion, grants Defendants' Corrected Motion to Quash Subpoena directed to the law firm Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. 235 in its entirety. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice(kef, )
|
|
Filing
275
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 11/1/2010: The Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant's motion for leave to file a Second Additional Affirmative Defense 256 . Defendants must file their Second Additional Affirmative Defense in accordance with this order by no later than 11/5/10. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice(kef, )
|
|
Filing
253
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 10/18/2010: The Court grants in part Defendants' motion to quash 219 with respect to deposing a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) deponent representing Ancel Glink. The Court, however, directs Defendants to file a reply brief providing the necessary information required to assert the attorney-client, common interest, or work product privileges with respect to the documents requested. Finally, Defendants must also address Plaintiff's argument concerning the crime-fraud exception as it relates to the documents requested. Defendants' reply brief is due on or before 10/25/10. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice(kef, )
|
|
Filing
214
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 8/23/2010: The Court, in its discretion, grants Plaintiff's motion to compel 187 . Defendants must produce the requested documents, affidavits of completeness, and/or appropriate privilege logs by no later than 9/1/10. The Court denies Plaintiff's request for fees. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice(kef, )
|
|
Filing
195
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 7/19/2010: The Court grants Plaintiffs' first and second motions to compel 179 181 in their entirety. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice(kef, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
