Bone Care International LLC et al v. Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
| Bone Care International LLC and Genzyme Corporation |
| Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| 1:2008cv01083 |
| February 21, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
653
MOTION by Defendants Cobrek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Counter Claimants Cobrek Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for judgment to be Entered (Stevenson, Robert)
|
|
Filing
651
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 3/29/2012. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
649
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 3/22/2012. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
643
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 3/30/2011: Before the Court are Defendants Pentech Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Cobrek Pharmaceuticals, Inc.s (collectively, Defendants) motion for summary judgment 473 of invalidity of cl aim 7 of U.S. Patent No. 5,602,116 (the 116 patent) for lack of enablement and lack of written description, and Plaintiffs Bone Care International, LLC and Genzyme Corporations (collectively, Plaintiffs) cross-motion for summary judgment 492 that the 116 paten is enabled as of the filing date of its parent patent application. For the reasons below, the Court denies both motions [473, 492]. Notices Mailed by Judge's Staff (tbk, )
|
|
Filing
546
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 10/19/2010. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
528
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 10/6/2010. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
524
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 10/4/2010: This minute order is issued to clarify a matter raised at this mornings status hearing concerning the scope of the Courts in limine rulings on Plaintiffs motion to preclude testi mony regarding certain invalidity defenses (Plaintiffs fourth motion in limine 409 ) and Defendants motion to preclude Plaintiffs from presentingevidence that purports to show entitlement to a claim of priority under 35 U.S.C. § 112 399 ). Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
521
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 10/1/2010. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
518
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 9/30/2010. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
498
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 9/17/2010. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
468
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/30/2010.(lcw, )
|
|
Filing
447
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Martin C. Ashman on 7/16/2010:Mailed notice(tlp, )
|
|
Filing
363
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 6/4/2010. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
327
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 4/23/2010. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
306
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Martin C. Ashman on 2/4/2010. (gmr, )
|
|
Filing
108
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 2/2/2009.Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
