Cruz et al v. City Of Chicago
Richard Cruz and Pearl Lufrano |
City Of Chicago and John Haleas |
1:2008cv02087 |
April 11, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Cook |
Robert M. Dow |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 125 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: the Court grants in part Defendants' motion to dismiss 119 and dismisses Plaintiff's two federal claims. The Court dismisses without prejudice Plaintiff's state law claims for intentional infliction of emotion distress (conspiracy); malicious prosecution; and indemnity with leave to re-file in state court within the one-year windowprovided by Illinois law. Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/24/2013. Mailed notice(tbk, ) |
Filing 84 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 2/15/2011: For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Defendant Haleass renewed motion to stay discovery 71 and Defendant City of Chicagos motion to join 77 . The stay of proceedin gs in this case is reinstated at least through the next status date in view of the ongoing criminal matters pertaining to Defendant Haleas. The parties are requested to file a joint status report by 4/30/2011 and this matter is set for further status on 5/5/2011 at 9:00a.m. Mailed by Judge's Staff notice(tbk, ) |
Filing 48 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 12/16/2008.Mailed notice(tbk, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.