Salinske v. Calumet City, Illinois
Plaintiff: Nick Salinske
Defendant: Calumet City, Illinois
Case Number: 1:2008cv03017
Filed: May 23, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office
County: XX US, Outside the State of IL
Presiding Judge: Wayne R. Andersen
Presiding Judge: Morton Denlow
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 70 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Wayne R. Andersen on 5/15/2009.(tsa, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salinske v. Calumet City, Illinois
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nick Salinske
Represented By: Philip C. Stahl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Calumet City, Illinois
Represented By: Robert R. Wilder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?