Gevas v. McCann et al
David Gevas |
Terry McCann, Dr. Mitchell, Mike Borkowski, Jane Doe, John Doe, Tammy Garcia, Melody J. Ford, Roger E Walker, Jr, Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Partha Ghosh and Euaristo Aguinaldo |
1:2008cv03074 |
May 28, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office |
Cook |
Ronald A. Guzman |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 378 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 6/27/2014: Rulings on motions in limine. Mailed notice (cjg, ) |
Filing 294 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 4/30/2013: For the reasons set forth in this order, the Court denies without prejudice plaintiff's motion for leave to file a fourth amended complaint 285 and gives plaintiff until May 20, 2013 to file an amended complaint that complies with 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 5/2-622. Mailed notice (cjg, ) |
Filing 251 MOTION by Defendants Euaristo Aguinaldo, Partha Ghosh for judgment (Tjepkema, Richard) |
Filing 231 MOTION by Defendants Mike Borkowski, Oliver Henderson for judgment as a matter of law (Walter, Christopher) |
Filing 227 MOTION by Plaintiff David Gevas for judgment as a Matter of Law (Clinite, Barbara) |
Filing 170 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 1/27/2011. Mailed notice (cjg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.