Cavin v. The City of Chicago, Illinois et al
Yahree Cavin |
The City of Chicago, Illinois, Richard Wiser, Luke Kelly, Wodnicki, Ronald Howell, Vito Ferro, Barrett Moran, Jr. and Unknown Chicago Police Officers |
1:2008cv03501 |
June 18, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Cook |
Wayne R. Andersen |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 128 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 8/8/2011: For the reasons stated below, the Court rejects plaintiff's objection to the award of costs for the video recording of Cavin's deposition and awards costs to defendants and against the Estate of Yahree Cavin in the full amount requested by defendants, $3,504.88. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (ber, ) |
Filing 125 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 6/13/2011: The Court denies plaintiff's motion for reconsideration [# 122] for the reasons stated below. Plaintiff's response to defendants' bill of costs is to be filed by 6/28/11; defendant's reply to plaintiff's response is to be filed by 7/8/11. [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice (ber, ) |
Filing 120 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 5/18/2011:(mb, ) |
Filing 29 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Wayne R. Andersen on 3/19/2009.(tsa, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.