Plaintiff LimitNone, LLC alleged that Defendant Google Inc. violated the Illinois Trade Secrets Act and Illinois Consumer Fraud & Deceptive Business Practices Act. Plaintiff charged that Defendant improperly accessed and copied Plaintiff's gMove email migration software and then created and released a competing software product called Google Email Uploader.
Limitnone LLC |
Google Inc. |
1:2008cv04178 |
July 23, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Copyright Office |
Cook |
Blanche M. Manning |
None |
Federal Question |
28:1446 Petition for Removal |
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 61 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of record transferred to United States District Court Northern District of California received date 1/29/2009; USDC Northern District of California case no. 09-cv-412. (aac, ) |
Filing 60 RETURN of U.S. Post Office receipt, article no. 7006 0100 0001 7312 6899. (aac, ) |
ELECTRONIC Acknowledgment by the USDC, Northern District of California, of Transferred case record opened as case number 5:09cv00412, filed on 1/29/09. (lcw, ) |
Filing 59 TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of California the electronic record via CM/ECF. Mailed paper document no. 29 via certified mail, article no. 7006 0100 0001 7312 6899. (aac, ) |
Filing 58 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Blanche M. Manning: In light of the Seventh Circuit's order denying the petition for a writ of mandamus, the stay of the court's transfer order is hereby lifted. The clerk is directed to transfer this case forthwith to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Mailed notice (aac, ) |
Filing 57 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of receipt from USCA; USCA Case No. 08-3499. (aac, ) |
Filing 56 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Blanche M. Manning: LimitNone's motion for a stay of the Court's transfer order pending resolution of its mandamus petition 50 is granted. The Clerk shall retain the record in this case until the Court orders otherwise. Google's motion for an extension of time to answer or otherwise plead 52 is also granted. If this case proceeds in this district, the Court will set a date for Google to file its responsive pleading. If the case proceeds in California, Google shall file its responsive pleading twenty days after the transfer-in order is entered on the docket unless the California Court orders otherwise. The Clerk is further directed to forward a copy of this order to the Seventh Circuit. Mailed notice by judge's staff. (srb,) |
Filing 55 RESPONSE by Google Inc.in Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Limitnone LLC to stay transfer pending appeal filed on emergency basis 50 (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 54 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Blanche M. Manning: Google shall file a response to LimitNone's renewed motion for a stay [#50] by Friday, October 3, at 1:00 p.m. The court expects to rule on LimitNone's motion to stay shortly after it has had an opportunity to consider Google's response. The clerk is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Seventh Circuit.Mailed notice (rth, ) |
Filing 53 NOTICE of Motion by Rachel Herrick for presentment of extension of time 52 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 10/7/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 52 MOTION by Defendant Google Inc. for extension of time to File Responsive Pleading (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 51 NOTICE by Limitnone LLC re MOTION by Plaintiff Limitnone LLC to stay transfer pending appeal filed on emergency basis 50 of Filing Exhibit A to Motion (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Wood, Stephen) |
Filing 50 MOTION by Plaintiff Limitnone LLC to stay transfer pending appeal filed on emergency basis (Wood, Stephen) |
Filing 49 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Blanche M. Manning: On September 22, 2008, this court entered an order transferring this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.4, the clerk may not transfer this case prior to October 6, 2008. On September 26, 2008, Limitnone filed a motion seeking to stay the September 22d transfer order. In its motion, Limitnone asserts that it intends to file a petition for a writ of mandamus and argues that a stay is necessary to give the Seventh Circuit an opportunity to consider the merits of its promised petition before the case is transferred. Limitnone noticed its motion to stay for October 1, 2008, and Google's out-of-town counsel contacted the court's clerk today to determine if an appearance is necessary tomorrow. It appears that Limitnone has not yet filed the promised petition for a writ of mandamus with the appellate court, despite the fact that this court issued its transfer order nine days ago on September 22d. Accordingly, Limitnone's motion to stay 46 is denied without prejudice.Mailed notice (rth, ) |
Filing 48 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Limitnone LLC by Stephen Arthur Wood (Wood, Stephen) |
Filing 47 NOTICE of Motion by Matthew Charles Luzadder for presentment of motion to stay 46 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 10/2/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Luzadder, Matthew) |
Filing 46 MOTION by Plaintiff Limitnone LLC to stay Transfer Pending Appeal (Luzadder, Matthew) |
Filing 45 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Blanche M. Manning: LimitNone's motion for reconsideration 30 is denied. Google's motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer venue 17 is granted in part. The clerk is directed to transfer this case to the federal district court for the Northern District of California in accordance with Local Rule 83.4, and to terminate the case from this court's docket. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice (aac, ) |
Filing 44 NOTICE of Correction regarding 43 . (aac, ) |
Filing 43 DOCUMENT entered in error. (Baskerville, Henry) Modified on 9/11/2008 (aac, ). |
Filing 42 NOTICE by Google Inc. re notice of removal 1 (Exhibit A) (Baskerville, Henry) |
Filing 41 REPLY by Defendant Google Inc. to motion to dismiss 17 (in Support of) (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 40 NOTICE by Limitnone LLC (Luzadder, Matthew) |
Filing 39 REPLY by Plaintiff Limitnone LLC to motion for reconsideration,, motion for relief,,,,,,, 30 (Luzadder, Matthew) |
Filing 38 RESPONSE by Google Inc.in Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiff Limitnone LLC for reconsideration regarding order on motion for leave to file,,,, order on motion for miscellaneous relief,,,, order on motion to stay,,,, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings,,, 27 MOTION by Plaintiff Limitnone LLC for reconsideration regarding order on motion for leave to file,,,, order on motion for miscellaneous relief,,,, order on motion to stay,,,, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings,,, 27 30 (Cyrluk, Jonathan) |
Filing 37 NOTICE by Limitnone LLC re response to motion 36 (Plater, Caroline) |
Filing 36 RESPONSE by Limitnone LLC to MOTION by Defendant Google Inc. to dismiss 17 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Plater, Caroline) |
Filing 35 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Blanche M. Manning: Plaintiff's Motion for leave to file brief in excess of 15 pages 31 is granted in excess of five pages. Plaintiff's Motion for reconsideration of 8/4/2008 minute order(docket no. 27) 30 is entered. Defendant to respond to the motion for reconsideration by 8/26/2008. Plaintiff to reply by 9/2/2008. The Court will rule expeditiously. Ruling will be by mail unless otherwise notified. No appearance is necessary on 8/19/2009. Mailed and telephoned notice by judge's staff. (srb,) |
Filing 34 Amended NOTICE of Motion by Matthew Charles Luzadder for presentment of motion for reconsideration,, motion for relief,,,,,,, 30 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 8/19/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Luzadder, Matthew) |
Filing 33 NOTICE of Motion by Caroline Claire Plater for presentment of motion for leave to file 31 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 8/19/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Plater, Caroline) |
Filing 32 NOTICE of Motion by Matthew Charles Luzadder for presentment of motion for reconsideration,, motion for relief,,,,,,, 30 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 8/19/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Luzadder, Matthew) |
Filing 31 MOTION by Plaintiff Limitnone LLC for leave to file Brief in Excess of 15 Pages (Plater, Caroline) |
Filing 30 MOTION by Plaintiff Limitnone LLC for reconsideration regarding order on motion for leave to file,,,, order on motion for miscellaneous relief,,,, order on motion to stay,,,, set motion and R&R deadlines/hearings,,, 27 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Luzadder, Matthew) |
Filing 29 EXHIBIT B to Defendant Google Inc.'s Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion to dismiss 18 for Improper Venue Under F.R.C.P 12(b)(3) or, in the Alternative, Motion to Transfer Under 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). (RESTRICTED)(kj, ) |
Filing 28 NOTICE by Google Inc. re memorandum in support of motion 18 of filing EXHIBIT B TO DEFENDANT GOOGLE INC.S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO DISMISS FOR IMPROPER VENUE UNDER F.R.C.P. 12(b)(3) OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, MOTION TO TRANSFER UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Baskerville, Henry) |
Filing 27 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Blanche M. Manning: The court will consider Google's motion to dismiss 17 before Limitnone's motion to remand. Accordingly, briefing shall proceed as follows on the motion to dismiss: Limitnone's response is due August 19, 2008, and Google's reply is due September 2, 2008. The court will rule by mail. Limitnone's motion for leave to file a motion to remand 12 is denied without prejudice. It is premature, since Limitnone has not fully complied with the court's standing order, and in any event, the court declines to consider Limitnone's arguments about preemption unless and until it determines that venue is proper in Illinois. Limitnone may renew its motion if the court finds that venue is proper in Illinois. Google's motions to stay discovery 23 and for leave to file a document under seal 20 are granted. Mailed notice (rth, ) |
Filing 26 SUPPLEMENT to motion for leave to file 12 (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Filing)(Plater, Caroline) |
Filing 25 NOTICE of Motion by Rachel Herrick for presentment of motion to stay 23 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 8/5/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 24 MEMORANDUM by Google Inc. in support of motion to stay 23 (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 23 MOTION by Defendant Google Inc. to stay Discovery (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 22 NOTICE of Motion by Rachel Herrick for presentment of motion for miscellaneous relief 20 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 8/5/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM by Google Inc. in support of motion for miscellaneous relief 20 (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 20 MOTION by Defendant Google Inc.FOR RESTRICTING ORDER PURSUANT TO L.R. 26.2, AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL AN UNREDACTED COPY OF EXHIBIT B TO ITS MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO L.R. 5.8 (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Motion by Rachel Herrick for presentment of motion to dismiss 17 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 8/5/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 18 MEMORANDUM by Google Inc. in support of motion to dismiss 17 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A & B)(Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 17 MOTION by Defendant Google Inc. to dismiss (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 16 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Google Inc. by Michael Thomas Zeller (Zeller, Michael) |
Filing 15 MINUTE entry before the Honorable Blanche M. Manning:Application for Rachel M. Herrick to appear pro hac vice 8 is granted. (rth, ) |
Filing 14 Corporate Disclosure STATEMENT by Limitnone LLC (Plater, Caroline) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Motion by Caroline Claire Plater for presentment of motion for leave to file 12 before Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 8/5/2008 at 11:00 AM. (Plater, Caroline) |
Filing 12 MOTION by Plaintiff Limitnone LLC for leave to file Motion to Remand (Plater, Caroline) |
Filing 11 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Limitnone LLC by David A. Rammelt (Rammelt, David) |
Filing 10 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Limitnone LLC by Caroline Claire Plater (Plater, Caroline) |
Filing 9 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Limitnone LLC by Matthew Charles Luzadder (Luzadder, Matthew) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 50, receipt number 07520000000002974005. (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Rachel M. Herrick (Herrick, Rachel) |
Filing 6 ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Google Inc. by Henry M. Baskerville (Baskerville, Henry) |
Filing 5 corporate disclosure STATEMENT by Google Inc. (Cyrluk, Jonathan) |
Filing 4 Notification as to Affiliates by Google Inc. (Cyrluk, Jonathan) |
MAILED Notice of Removal Letter with attorney appearance form to Counsel of Record Kelley Drye & Warren LLP. (ca, ) |
Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet. (ca, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal from Circuit Court of Cook County, case number (2008 L 006828) filed by Google Inc. Filing fee $ 350. (ca, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Limitnone LLC v. Google Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Limitnone LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Google Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jonathan M. Cyrluk |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.