Ernst et al v. City of Chicago
Plaintiff: Stacy Ernst, Michelle Lahalih, Dawn Hoard, Irene Res Puallano and Katherine Kean
Defendant: City of Chicago
Case Number: 1:2008cv04370
Filed: August 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Charles R. Norgle
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 21, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 790 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: Plaintiffs Ernst, Hoard, Res, and Kean are entitled to instatement as paramedics and an award of back pay. Plaintiff Lahalih is entitled to back pay and front pay to April 2025. The parties are directed to prepare calculations as directed in this opinion and to submit a proposed judgment order, agreed as to form, within 21 days. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 12/21/2018. Mailed notice. (etv, )
November 18, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 516 MOTION by Defendant City of Chicago for judgment as a Matter of Law (Donham, Cary)
May 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 419 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey Cole on 5/5/2014:Mailed notice(jms, )
November 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 266 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey Cole on 11/21/2013:Mailed notice(jms, )
September 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 228 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey Cole on 9/9/2013:Mailed notice(jms, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ernst et al v. City of Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stacy Ernst
Represented By: Susan Patricia Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Lahalih
Represented By: Susan Patricia Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dawn Hoard
Represented By: Susan Patricia Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irene Res Puallano
Represented By: Susan Patricia Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katherine Kean
Represented By: Susan Patricia Malone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Chicago
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?