US Bank National Association v. Builders Bank
Plaintiff: US Bank National Association
Defendant: Builders Bank
Case Number: 1:2008cv05648
Filed: October 3, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside the State of IL
Presiding Judge: James B. Moran
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Federal Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 78 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Written by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 3/25/2011.Mailed notice.(jlj)
September 16, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 9/16/2009.Mailed notice(tbk, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: US Bank National Association v. Builders Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: US Bank National Association
Represented By: Konstantinos Armiros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Builders Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?