Central Laborers' Pension Fund Board of Trustees et al v. Canterbury Homes, Inc. et al
Central Laborers' Pension Fund Board of Trustees, Central Laborers' Welfare Fund Board of Trustees, Central Laborers' Annuity Fund Board of Trustees and Barry McAnarney |
Canterbury Homes, Inc. and Joseph F. Hook, Jr. |
1:2008cv06676 |
November 20, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. Office |
Cook |
Charles R. Norgle |
None |
Federal Question |
29:1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 55 MOTION by Plaintiffs Central Laborers' Annuity Fund Board of Trustees, Central Laborers' Pension Fund Board of Trustees, Central Laborers' Welfare Fund Board of Trustees for judgment (confession of judgment on default of settlement agreement) (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Toth, Richard) |
Filing 51 MOTION by Plaintiffs Central Laborers' Annuity Fund Board of Trustees, Central Laborers' Pension Fund Board of Trustees, Central Laborers' Welfare Fund Board of Trustees, Barry McAnarney to reopen case against Canterbury Homes, Inc. , MOTION by Plaintiffs Central Laborers' Annuity Fund Board of Trustees, Central Laborers' Pension Fund Board of Trustees, Central Laborers' Welfare Fund Board of Trustees, Barry McAnarney for judgment against Canterbury Homes, Inc. (Toth, Richard) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.