Smith v. Hunt et al
| Gregory Smith |
| Jalate Hunt and J Cortes |
| 1:2008cv06982 |
| December 5, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Contract: Insurance Office |
| Cook |
| Virginia M. Kendall |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
WRITTEN Opinion: Page 2 of the courts order in document 94 . Advised in open court(tsa, )
|
|
Filing
91
WRITTEN Opinion before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/3/2011: During the Final Pretrial Conference held in this case on December 15, 2010, the Court made the following rulings:The Court grants Plaintiff's oral Motion to Voluntarily Dismi ss Counts II (common law battery), V (common law battery), and VIII (indemnification) of Smith's Second Amended Complaint. The Court grants Plaintiff's oral Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss any claim for punitive damages against the Defendant s in this case. The Court grants in part, denies in part, and takes under advisement in part Plaintiff's Motions in Limine 77 . The Court grants in part, denies in part, and takes under advisement in part Defendants' oral motion to exclude witness Myron Perkins from testifying about the December 28, 2007 incident and Defendants' three Motions in Limine 83 .Mailed notice(dl, )
|
|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 9/27/2010.(tsa, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
