Lemon v. Dart et al
| Douglas Lemon |
| Tom Dart, County of Cook and Salvador Godinez |
| 1:2008cv07180 |
| January 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office |
| Cook |
| Amy J. St. Eve |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
WRITTEN Opinion; The Clerk is directed to: (1) reopen the case; (2) add Supt. Andrew, Lt. Earl Tucker, and Correctional Officer McCray as Defendants; (3) issue summonses for service of the fourth amended complaint on the Defendants; and (4) send Plai ntiff a magistrate judge consent form and filing instructions along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff's renewed motion for appointment of counsel 41 is denied for the reason set forth in the Court's Minute Order of February 16, 2010. T he U.S. Marshal Service is appointed to serve the defendants. Initial status hearing set for 9/15/10 at 8:30 a.m. Defendants' counsel is directed to make arrangements for plaintiff Douglas Lemon to appear via telephone and should contact the courtroom deputy, 312/435-5879, by 9/14/10 with the contact information. (For further details see written opinion). Signed by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 7/12/2010. Mailed notice.(jj, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
