Heneghan v. City of Chicago Aviation Police Dept. et al
| 1:2009cv00759 |
| February 5, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Civil Rights: Jobs Office |
| Harry D. Leinenweber |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
187
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 10/3/2011: Defendants' Bill of Costs is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is liable to Defendants in the amount of $11,346.66.Mailed notice(wp, )
|
|
Filing
107
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 4/18/2011: For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification 103 is granted.Mailed notice(wp, )
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 12/8/2010:Mailed notice(wp, )
|
|
Filing
76
WRITTEN Opinion Defendant City of Chicago's Motion for Reconsideration 52 is denied. Plaintiff's Petition for Attorney Fees 60 is granted in part, and Defendant City of Chicago is ordered to pay $4,038.14 to Plaintiff. Mailed notice(wp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Heneghan v. City of Chicago Aviation Police Dept. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
