Carter v. Dart et al

Plaintiff: Willie Earl Carter
Defendant: Thomas Dart, M. J. Salazar, Director of Cermak Health Services and County of Cook
Case Number: 1:2009cv00956
Filed: February 13, 2009
Court: Illinois Northern District Court
Office: Civil Rights (Prison Condition) Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Robert M. Dow
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
June 14, 2011 75 Opinion or Order of the Court WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Susan E. Cox on 6/14/2011: Plaintiff's motion to take more than ten depositions dkt. 62 is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is given leave to depose the officer, or officers, that escorted plaintiff while at Stroger Hospital, but plaintiff is not given leave to depose all eight officers without further order of the Court. Plaintiff is given leave to depose either Mr. Gaspar or Ms. Wroble. Plaintiff is also given leave to depose the grievance officials, but plaintiff's request to depose Linda Kampe, an official at Cermak Health Services, is denied. [ For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice(hp, )
April 18, 2011 64 Opinion or Order of the Court WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 4/18/2011: Before the Court are (1) Defendants motion to bifurcate and to stay discovery and trial as to Plaintiffs claims against Cook County under Monell v. Department of Social Services , 436 U.S. 658 (1976) 54 and Plaintiffs motion to take additional depositions 62 . For the reasons set forth below, the Court respectfully denies Defendants motion to bifurcate and stay 54 and refers the motion to take additional depositions [62 ], along with all further discovery motions and supervision, to the calendar of Magistrate Judge Cox. The notice of motion date of 4/19/2011 is stricken and no appearances in the district court are required on that date; however, the case remains set for status in the district court on 5/12/2011.Notices Mailed by Judge's Staff notice(tbk, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carter v. Dart et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Willie Earl Carter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Dart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. J. Salazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Director of Cermak Health Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Cook
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?