National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trus Fund v. Tamarack heating & Cooling Inc
| National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet metal Industry Fund |
| Tamarack heating & Cooling Inc |
| 1:2009cv01152 |
| February 23, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Other Statutory Actions Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Marvin E. Aspen |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet Metal Industry Trus Fund v. Tamarack heating & Cooling Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tamarack heating & Cooling Inc | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: National Stabilization Agreement of the Sheet metal Industry Fund | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
