Carden v. Village Discount Outlet, Inc.
Plaintiff: Darrell Carden
Defendant: Village Discount Outlet, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv02090
Filed: April 5, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Milton I. Shadur
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1981 Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 40 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 9/2/2009:Mailed notice(srn, )
July 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 MEMORANDUM Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 7/28/2009:Mailed notice(srn, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carden v. Village Discount Outlet, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darrell Carden
Represented By: Charles Thomas Siedlecki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Village Discount Outlet, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?