Ortiz v. Edwards et al
Daniel Ortiz, Sr. |
D Edwards, A. Hicks, C Hall and The City of Chicago |
1:2009cv02636 |
April 30, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Robert M. Dow |
Plaintiff |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 110 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 8/16/2012: Final pre-trial conference held on 8/14/2012. For the reasons stated on the record in open court, Plaintiff's motions in limine 89 are withdrawn in part, granted in p art, and reserved in part, and Defendants' motions in limine 90 are granted in part, denied in part, and reserved in part. For additional detail, please see below. In addition, Defendants are directed to give notice by 8/15/2012 of whether the y would like to conduct criminal background checks on jurors; Plaintiff is given until 8/17/2012 to respond if Defendants indicate that they are so inclined. Parties are given until 8/21/2012 to submit revised exhibit and witness lists and any supplemental briefing as discussed on the record during the pre-trial conference. Jury trial remains set for 8/27/2012 at 9:00 a.m. Counsel are asked to be present by 8:30 a.m. Mailed notice(tbk, ) |
Filing 76 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 5/18/2011. Notices Mailed by Judge's Staff (tbk, ) |
Filing 65 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr. on 9/22/2010.(vmj, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.