Williams v. Forest Preserve District of Cook County

Justia Dockets & Filings Seventh Circuit Illinois Northern District Williams v. Forest Preserve District of Cook County

Williams v. Forest Preserve District of Cook County

Plaintiff:	Williams Talana
Defendant:	Forest Preserve District of Cook County
Case Number:	1:2009cv07810
Filed:	December 16, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	Blanche M. Manning
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Both

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 14, 2011	Filing 65 The defendant's motion to dismiss Count III [47-1] is denied. WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 12/14/2011: Mailed notice(rth, )
October 1, 2010	Filing 26 Defendant Forest Preserve District of Cook Countys motion to dismiss [14-1] is granted in part and deniedin part as follows: the motion to dismiss Counts I and III is denied, while the motion to dismiss Count II isgranted. The court construes plainti ff Talana Williams response to the motion to dismiss as a motion forleave to file an amended complaint, which is granted. Any amended complaint shall be filed no later thanOctober 28, 2010. The court also notes that despite the warning in its July 27 , 2010, order, Williamsnonresident counsel has still failed to procure local counsel as required under Local Rule 83.15. Consistent with the warning in the July 27, 2010, order and with the penalties set out in Local Rule 83.15(b), until local counse l is procured and files an appearance, the court shall strike any documents filed by Williams nonresident counsel. The parties shall report for a status hearing on November 30, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. If Williams counsel wishes to participate in the status hearing by telephone, he must also have local counselpresent in court. Mailed notice(jms, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 14, 2011

Filing 65 The defendant's motion to dismiss Count III [47-1] is denied. WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 12/14/2011: Mailed notice(rth, )

October 1, 2010

Filing 26 Defendant Forest Preserve District of Cook Countys motion to dismiss [14-1] is granted in part and deniedin part as follows: the motion to dismiss Counts I and III is denied, while the motion to dismiss Count II isgranted. The court construes plainti ff Talana Williams response to the motion to dismiss as a motion forleave to file an amended complaint, which is granted. Any amended complaint shall be filed no later thanOctober 28, 2010. The court also notes that despite the warning in its July 27 , 2010, order, Williamsnonresident counsel has still failed to procure local counsel as required under Local Rule 83.15. Consistent with the warning in the July 27, 2010, order and with the penalties set out in Local Rule 83.15(b), until local counse l is procured and files an appearance, the court shall strike any documents filed by Williams nonresident counsel. The parties shall report for a status hearing on November 30, 2010, at 11:00 a.m. If Williams counsel wishes to participate in the status hearing by telephone, he must also have local counselpresent in court. Mailed notice(jms, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Forest Preserve District of Cook County
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Williams Talana
Represented By:	Robert E Kinchen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Forest Preserve District of Cook County
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?