McDowell v. Alvarez et al
Philip W. McDowell |
Anita Alvarez, County of Cook and Village of Alsip, Illinois |
1:2009cv08033 |
January 21, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Vermilion |
Ronald A. Guzman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 140 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 10/24/2012: Plaintiff Phillip McDowell's current motion to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP") on appeal 136 is denied without prejudice. Based upon McDowells statement of i ssues he intends to raise on appeal 137 , the appeal described will necessarily fail and this Court therefore certifies that the appeal, as described, would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). McDowell is given 30 days fro m the date of this order to submit another statement of his appellate issues in accordance with this order. His failure to submit such a statement will result in the denial of his motion to proceed IFP on appeal with prejudice. The clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the PLRA Attorney, U.S. Court of Appeals. Mailed notice. (For further details see opinion)(pcs, ) |
Filing 127 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 8/15/2012. (et, ) |
Filing 50 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Ronald A. Guzman on 7/6/2010. Mailed notice (cjg, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.