Prewitt v. Gartner et al
| Lacey Prewitt |
| Ervin Gartner, Anuj Partkh and Jim Bushman |
| 1:2010cv00102 |
| January 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Charles P. Kocoras |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 10/31/2012.Mailed notice(sct, )
|
|
Filing
121
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 10/26/2011.Mailed notice(sct, )
|
|
Filing
86
WRITTEN Opinion signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 2/23/2011: Ruling held on 2/23/2011. Defendants' motions (Doc 69 ) to alter or amend judgment are denied. Defendants' motions (Doc 69 ) for summary judgment are also denied. (For further details see separate order.)Mailed notice(sct, )
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 11/8/2010.Mailed notice(sct, )
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras on 8/9/2010: The United States' motion (Docs 23 and 26 ) to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Counts IV, V, VIII and X against the United States are dismissed without prejudice. Status hearing set for 8/25/2010 at 9:30 a.m. to stand. (For further details see minute order.)Mailed notice(sct, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
