United Central Bank v. Kanan Fashions, Inc. et al
| United Central Bank |
| Kanan Fashions, Inc, Creative Warehousing, LLC, Kanan Holdings, LLC, Varsha Shah, Mehul Shah and Kanan Cruises, Inc. |
| Creative Warehousing, LLC, Varsha Shah, Kanan Fashions, Inc, Kanan Holdings, LLC, Mehul Shah and Kanan Cruises, Inc. |
| United Central Bank |
| 1:2010cv00331 |
| January 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert W. Gettleman |
| Michael T. Mason |
| Contract: Negotiable Instrument |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 Default of Promissory Note |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
570
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Michael T. Mason on 4/23/12.(rbf, )
|
|
Filing
487
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Written by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 9/21/2011.Mailed notice.(jlj)
|
|
Filing
453
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Written by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 5/13/2011.Mailed notice.(jlj)
|
|
Filing
415
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Written by the Honorable Gary Feinerman on 2/18/2011.Mailed notice.(jlj)
|
|
Filing
154
WRITTEN Opinion by the Honorable Michael T. Mason on 8/12/2010: Plaintiff's Corrected Motion for Protective Order Limiting Discovery 89 is granted in part and denied in part. For further details, see below. (rbf, )
|
|
Filing
47
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Michael T. Mason on 3/5/2010. (ber, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
