Pactiv Corporation v. Multisorb Technologies, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Pactiv Corporation
Defendant: Multisorb Technologies, Inc. and Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2010cv00461
Filed: January 22, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Cook
Presiding Judge: Harry D. Leinenweber
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 477 Amended Memorandum Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 8/6/2014:Mailed notice(wp, )
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 461 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 7/2/2014:Mailed notice(wp, )
May 29, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 361 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 5/29/2013: For the reasons stated herein, Defendant Multisorb Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Strike and Exclude Portions of the Expert Report of Dr. Lisa D. Detter-Hoskin and Alleged Prior Art Not Disclosed in Pactiv's Invalidity Contentions (ECF No. 348) is granted. [For further details see order.]Electronic notice(jat, )
January 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 320 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 1/9/2013:Mailed notice(wp, )
May 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 308 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 5/18/2012:Mailed notice(wp, )
March 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 290 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 3/27/2012:Mailed notice(wp, )
November 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 235 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 11/2/2011: For the reasons explained herein, Defendant/Counter-Claimant Multisorb Technologies Inc's Motion to Amend its Counterclaim 223 is granted, and Pactiv's Motion for Partial Judgment on Pleadings and to Dismiss 219 is denied. The oral ruling date of Nov. 30, 2011 is stricken.Mailed notice(wp, )
October 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 226 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 10/13/2011:Mailed notice(wp, )
September 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 219 MOTION by Plaintiff Pactiv Corporation for judgment Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings and to Dismiss, MOTION by Plaintiff Pactiv Corporation for judgment on the pleadings (Chaban, Mitchell)
February 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 131 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 2/15/2011:(mb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pactiv Corporation v. Multisorb Technologies, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pactiv Corporation
Represented By: Jonathan Mandel Weis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Multisorb Technologies, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mitsubishi Gas Chemical America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?