Ratliff v. Carroll et al
| Pares Ratliff |
| J. Carroll, B. Murphy and City Of Chicago |
| 1:2010cv00739 |
| February 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/8/2013. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
152
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 2/26/2013: For the reasons stated below, Defendants' motion for extension of time to submit LR 54.3 materials 146 is granted in part and denied in part; Defendants are given a fi nal extension until 2/28/2013 to provide their LR 54.3 materials. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file oversized brief instanter 148 is granted. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file petition for fees and costs pursuant to LR 54.3 and to b ar Defendants' objections 150 is granted in part and denied in part; Plaintiff may file his LR 54.3 petition by 3/11/2013 as set out in the existing scheduling order 145 ; Plaintiffs motion to bar is denied without prejudice and may be renewe d if Defendants do not provide their LR 54.3 materials by 2/28/2013. Notice of motion dates of 2/28/2013 and 3/5/2013 are stricken and no appearances are necessary on that date. The parties are directed to notify the Court promptly should the settlement discussions referenced in the parties recent filings result in an agreement. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
131
MOTION by Plaintiff Pares Ratliff for judgment (Filed in court 11/29/12) (Kosoglad, Jared)
|
|
Filing
127
MOTION by Defendants J. Carroll, City Of Chicago, B. Murphy for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to rule 50(a) (Scolaro, Jeffrey)
|
|
Filing
118
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 11/20/2012:For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiff's oral motion pursuant to FRE 611 to call certain witnesses as adverse. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
116
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 11/19/2012:For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendants' motions in limine 94 and grants in part and denies in part Plaintiff's m otions in limine 96 . The Court also grants Defendants' motion for leave to file an additional motion in limine 20 111 . In light of the response and reply briefs filed on November 18, 2012 the Court reserves ruling on related motions in limine 5 and 20. The Court will discuss the recent filings with counsel at today's status hearing. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
