JP Morgan Chase, N.A. v. Snower
Plaintiff: JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Defendant: Bradley Snower
Case Number: 1:2010cv03586
Filed: June 10, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Lake
Presiding Judge: James B. Zagel
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable James B. Zagel on 9/15/2010: Plaintiff's motion to remand 6 is granted. This action is remanded to the Circuit Court of Lake County, Illinois. Status hearing set for 10/12/2010 is stricken. (Civil Case Terminated.) (For further detail see order.) Mailed notice(hp, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JP Morgan Chase, N.A. v. Snower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bradley Snower
Represented By: Larry D. Drury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JP Morgan Chase, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?