Doctor's Data, Inc. v. Barrett et al
| Doctor's Data, Inc. |
| Stephen Joel Barrett, Quackwatch, Inc., The National Council Against Health Fraud, Inc. and Consumer Health Digest |
| 1:2010cv03795 |
| June 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| William J. Hibbler |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
305
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order, Count I of the Third Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and the defendants' motion for summary judgment 248 as to that count is d enied as moot. The defendants' motion is granted as to Counts II, VI, VII, and IX, denied as to Count X, and granted in part and denied in part as to Count V. Counts III, IV, VIII, and XI, which were previously dismissed 85 , remain so. DDI 9;s motion for partial summary judgment on Count V 242 is denied. The parties' respective Daubert motions [232, 233, 234, 235, and 237] are dismissed without prejudice. A status hearing will be held on Wednesday, April 6, 2016, at 9:30 a.m. Signed by the Honorable John J. Tharp, Jr on 3/21/2016 (For further details see order) Mailed notice(air, ) Modified on 3/21/2016 (air, ).
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 11/22/2011. Mailed notice.(srb,)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
