Smith v. School District 203
Plaintiff: Samantha Smith
Defendant: School District 203
Case Number: 1:2010cv04185
Filed: July 6, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office: Chicago Office
County: Will
Presiding Judge: Robert M. Dow
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 6 WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 7/15/2010: For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is granted and the Court requests that the U.S. Marshal's office effect service of Plaintiff's complaint 1 . Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel 5 is denied without prejudice. Mailed notice(vcf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. School District 203
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Samantha Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: School District 203
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?