Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC. v. New York Times Co.
| Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC. |
| New York Times Co. |
| 1:2010cv04387 |
| July 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| John W. Darrah |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
308
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 8/14/2013. (ph, )
|
|
Filing
290
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 6/21/2013.(mr, )
|
|
Filing
227
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Jeffrey T. Gilbert on 3/8/2013: Hearing held on Defendants' Unopposed-In-Part Motion To Compel Production of Third-Party Licenses & Limited Access Exception For Licensing Documents [DE# 204 ]. For the re asons stated on the record, the Motion is granted in part, denied in part, and withdrawn in part. Hearing held on Motion By Objector Nokia Corporation To Intervene [DE# 216 ]. The Motion is granted and Nokia is allowed to intervene in this case for t he limited purpose of objecting to Defendants' Motion to Compel [DE# 204 ]. Objectors PGA Tour, Inc. and Kyocera Corporation also are granted leave to intervene in this case for the same limited purpose. See Statement for further details. Mailed notice(mr, )
|
|
Filing
172
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable John W. Darrah on 11/8/2012: Status hearing and ruling on motion hearing held. On June 28, 2012, an amended scheduling order was entered in these cases, setting forth the various dates and deadlines, including the deadlines relating to claim construction. On July 20, 2012, Plaintiff Helferich Patent Licensing, L.L.C. ("HPL") moved for expedited claim construction. Defendants oppose this motion. In addition, Defendants move for an expedited brief ing schedule on their motions for summary judgment of patent exhaustion. For the reasons stated below, HPL's Motion to Expedite Claim Construction is denied. Defendants' Motion for Expedited Exhaustion Briefing is granted, and all discovery on the issue of exhaustion is to be completed on or before January 15, 2013. Defendants' Joint Motion for Summary Judgment of Exhaustion shall be filed on or before February 12, 2013; HPL's Response is due on March 12, 2013; and Reply is due on April 2, 2013. A status date for ruling on the issue of exhaustion is set for May 7, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. [For further details see opinion] Mailed notice. (np, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC. v. New York Times Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC. | |
| Represented By: | James David Busch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: New York Times Co. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
