Comerica Bank v. 74 Leo, Inc. et al
| Comerica Bank |
| 74 Leo, Inc. and Chong Kook Kim |
| 1:2010cv05376 |
| August 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F Kennelly |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 DEFAULT JUDGMENT Order re #20 Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 5/31/2011: Mailed notice (hp, ) |
| Filing 20 MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Hearing on motion for default judgment is granted #18 . Enter order. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $225,120.57. [ For further detail see separate order.] Mailed notice (hp, ) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Motion by Martin J. Wasserman for presentment of motion for default judgment #18 before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 5/31/2011 at 09:30 AM. (Wasserman, Martin) |
| Filing 18 MOTION by Plaintiff Comerica Bank for default judgment as to 74 Leo, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Wasserman, Martin) |
| Filing 17 DEFAULT Judgment Order Signed by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 3/1/2011.(rp, ) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly:Motion for default judgment #14 is granted. Enter Default judgment order. Judgment is entered in favor of Comerica Bank and against Chong Kook Kim in the amount of $220,315.65. Civil case terminated. (For further details see separate order)Mailed notice (rp, ) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Motion by Martin J. Wasserman for presentment of motion for default judgment #14 before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 2/17/2011 at 09:30 AM. (Wasserman, Martin) |
| Filing 14 MOTION by Plaintiff Comerica Bank for default judgment as to Chong Kook Kim (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Wasserman, Martin) |
| Filing 13 MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly:Status hearing pursuant to Rule 16(b) held with plaintiff's attorney appearing. Status hearing continued to 5/11/2011 at 09:30 AM. Plaintiff's attorney is directed to advise defendants in writing of the date and time of the status hearing. (or, ) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE returned executed by Comerica Bank. 74 Leo, Inc. waiver sent on 1/6/2011, answer due 3/7/2011. (Wasserman, Martin) |
| Filing 11 MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Comerica Bank's motion to extend time is granted in part. The time for plaintiff to serve defendant 74 Leo, Inc. with summons is extended to 2/15/11. Comerica's counsel may wish to research whether, if service of the corporate via Mr. Kim cannot be accomplished, it may obtain service via some other means under Illinois law in view of the fact that 74 Leo, Inc. allegedly has relocated and left no contact address in Illinois. The case remains set for a status hearing on 1/20/11 at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to advise defendants of that date in writing. Mailed notice (hp, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Motion by Martin J. Wasserman for presentment of extension of time #9 before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 12/16/2010 at 09:30 AM. (Wasserman, Martin) |
| Filing 9 MOTION by Plaintiff Comerica Bank for extension of time to serve Summons (Wasserman, Martin) |
| Filing 8 MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly:Status hearing pursuant to Rule 16(b) with plaintiff's attorney appearing. Status hearing continued to 1/20/2011 at 09:00 AM. Plaintiff's attorney is directed to notify defendants of the new date. (or, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued as to Defendant 74 Leo, Inc. (lcw, ) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly:Status hearing pursuant to Rule 16(b)held with plaintiff's attorney appearing. The record reflects that defendant Kim has been served with summons as of 10/6/2010. Status hearing continued to 12/6/2010 at 9:00 AM. Plaintiff's attorney is directed to notify defendants of the new date. Defendant Kim appeared in chambers at approximately 9:30 AM. The Court gave him instructions about filing a written response to the complaint and suggested that he contact Comerica Bank's attorney. (or, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Comerica Bank as to Chong Kook Kim on 10/6/2010, answer due 10/27/2010. (Wasserman, Martin) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE entry before Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly: Status hearing set to 9:00 a.m. on Monday, November 1, 2010 before Judge Kennelly, in Chambers, Room 2188. Parties are to review and comply with Judge Kennelly's standing initial order, which may be found on his web page at http://www.ilnd.uscourts.gov/JUDGE/KENNELLY/mfkpage.htm. Counsel for plaintiff (s) are ordered to cause a copy of this order to be delivered forthwith to each defendant in the same manner that summons has been or is being served on each defendant. Mailed notice (vcf, ) |
| SUMMONS Issued two originals as to Defendant Chong Kook Kim at two different addresses. (kjd, ) |
| Filing 4 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Comerica Bank by Martin J. Wasserman (Wasserman, Martin) |
| Filing 3 ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff Comerica Bank by Kurt M. Carlson (Carlson, Kurt) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL Cover Sheet (Carlson, Kurt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Comerica Bank; Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 0752-5154990. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(Carlson, Kurt) |
| CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Michael T. Mason. (lcw, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
