Howell v. C/O Cook et al
| Todd Sean Howell |
| C/O Cook and C/O Nolan |
| 1:2010cv05395 |
| August 26, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Randolph |
| James F. Holderman |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
Plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [#4] is granted. The Court orders the trust fund officer atPlaintiffs place of incarceration to deduct $3.63 from Plaintiffs account for payment to the Clerk of Court as an initialpartial filing fee, and to continue making monthly deductions in accordance with this order. However, summonses shallnot issue at this time. The complaint on file is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is granted thirty days to submit anamended complaint (plus a judges copy and service copies) limited to a single, core claim in accordance with this order.The Clerk is directed to provide Plaintiff with an amended civil rights complaint form and instructions for filing along witha copy of this order. Failure to submit an amended complaint within thirty days will result in summary dismissal of thiscase.WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 9/23/2010. For further detial see written opinion).Mailed notice(smm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
