United Central Bank v. JJST INC. et al
| United Central Bank |
| JJST INC., Racine Citgo Inc., Harrison and Homan Citgo Inc., 81st and Racine Citgo Inc., Jacob Vayalil, Sibi Kadalimattom, 147, Inc., Loomis, Inc., Sabu Geo, Sabu Lukose, 154th & Cottage Inc., Marilyn Mathew, Schmidt Salzman & Moran, Ltd., Jonah Robinson, 95th and Escabana, Inc., Zachariah J. Kizmakkechirattolickal and Escabana Citgo Inc. |
| 1:2010cv05550 |
| September 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| George W. Lindberg |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
MOTION by Plaintiff United Central Bank for judgment on Counts I, II, V, VI, VII, X, XI, XIV, XV, XVIII and XIX of Complaint (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Text of P roposed Order Proposed Order, # 7 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, # 8 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, # 9 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, # 10 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order, # 11 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Abrams, Andrew)
|
|
Filing
74
MEMORANDUM Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 2/1/2012:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
68
MEMORANDUM Order Signed by the Honorable Milton I. Shadur on 1/20/2012:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
