Midwest Fence Corporation et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
| Midwest Fence Corporation, Victor Mendez and Tom Weisner |
| United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Ray LaHood, Illinois Department Of Transportation, Gary Hannig, Illinois Toll Highway Authority, Paula Wolff, Patrick Quinn, James J Banks, George Pradel, Carl O Towns, James M. Roolf, Thomas Canham, Bill Morris and Maria N. Saldana |
| 1:2010cv05627 |
| September 3, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Harry D. Leinenweber |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
533
For the reasons stated in the attached memorandum opinion and order, the Court grants in part and denies in part both bills of costs. For the Tollway Defendants, the Court taxes against Midwest $16,577.26 in costs, comprising: $15,040.7 0 in court reporting and transcript costs; $1,320.16 in electronic discovery costs; and $216.40 in third-party discovery costs. For the IDOT Defendants, the Court taxes against Midwest $26,333.25 in costs, comprising: $11,124.80 in court reporting and transcript costs; $11,054.75 in subpoena and service of process costs; and $4,153.70 in document production costs. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 3/29/2018:Mailed notice(maf)
|
|
Filing
464
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Civil case terminated. Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 3/24/2015:Mailed notice(wp, )
|
|
Filing
312
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 1/28/2014: Midwest's Motion to Exclude Opinions of Jon Wainwright 280 is denied.Mailed notice(wp, )
|
|
Filing
195
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 6/26/2012: The Tollway Defendants Motion to Compel Discovery is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff is ordered to produce the material requested in No. 6 but limited to 2 004 forward; the material requested in No. 7 limited to "relate" and from 2004 forward; and the material requested in No. 21 that specifically refers to the DBE program from 2004 forward. Plaintiff is excused from complying with request No. 16.(wp, )
|
|
Filing
128
WRITTEN OPINION entered by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 9/27/2011:For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff's Motion for Discovery and Other Relief 117 is granted in part and denied in part, and Defendant's Joint Supplemental Motion for Discovery 120 is granted. Mailed notice(wp, )
|
|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber on 6/27/2011:Mailed notice(wp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
