Lee v. Jackson Park Hospital et al
| Nickolas Lee |
| Jackson Park Hospital and David Williams |
| 1:2010cv07676 |
| December 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Sharon Johnson Coleman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
WRITTEN Opinion Signed by the Honorable Sharon Johnson Coleman on 12/27/2010: The plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted. However, the complaint is dismissed on initial review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e )(2)(B)(i) as frivolous. The case is terminated. The Clerk is requested to enter a Rule 58 judgment in favor of defendants Jackson Park Hospital and Dr.David Williams against Plaintiff Nickolas Lee. Plaintiff shall take nothing. Any other pending mot ions are denied as moot. The trust fund officer at the plaintiff's place of incarceration is authorized and ordered to make deductions from the plaintiffs account and payments to the clerk of court as stated herein. The clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to the Supervisor of Inmate Trust Fund Accounts, Cook County Dept. of Corrections Administrative Office, Division V, 2700 S. California, Chicago, Illinois 60608. This is one of the plaintiff's three allotted dismissals under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). [For further details see written opinion.] (Civil case terminated). Mailed notice (hp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
