Crawley v. ED Morse Cadillac

Crawley v. ED Morse Cadillac

Plaintiff:	Helen Crawley
Defendant:	ED Morse Cadillac
Case Number:	1:2010cv07865
Filed:	December 10, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Cook
Presiding Judge:	James F. Holderman
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 15, 2011	Filing 34 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 7/15/2011: For the reasons explained in the Statement section of this order, defendant Morse Operations, Inc.'s ("Morse Operations") "Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Per sonal Jurisdiction and Venue, and Motion to Quash Service of Process" 15 is granted in part and denied in part. Because the court finds that Morse Operations is not subject to personal jurisdiction in Illinois, Morse Operations's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted and Morse Operations's motions to dismiss for improper venue and to quash service of process are denied as moot. Morse Operations's second "Motion to Quash Service of Process" 29 and plaintiff Helen Crawley's "Motion Redoing to Jurisdiction and Venue" 26 are also denied as moot. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 7/15/2011: Mailed notice (am)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 15, 2011

Filing 34 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 7/15/2011: For the reasons explained in the Statement section of this order, defendant Morse Operations, Inc.'s ("Morse Operations") "Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Per sonal Jurisdiction and Venue, and Motion to Quash Service of Process" 15 is granted in part and denied in part. Because the court finds that Morse Operations is not subject to personal jurisdiction in Illinois, Morse Operations's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is granted and Morse Operations's motions to dismiss for improper venue and to quash service of process are denied as moot. Morse Operations's second "Motion to Quash Service of Process" 29 and plaintiff Helen Crawley's "Motion Redoing to Jurisdiction and Venue" 26 are also denied as moot. Signed by the Honorable James F. Holderman on 7/15/2011: Mailed notice (am)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crawley v. ED Morse Cadillac
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Helen Crawley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: ED Morse Cadillac
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?