Sullivan et al v. Ross Mechanical, Inc.
James T Sullivan, Plumbers Pension Fund Local 130 U A, Plumbers Welfare Fund, Local 130, U.A., The Trust Fund for Apprentice and Journeymen Education and Training, Local Union 130, U.A., Chicago Journeymen Plumbers' Local Union 130, U.A. Group Legal Services Plan Fund, Chicago Journeymen Plumbers Local Union 130 U.A. and The Plumbing Council of Chicagoland |
Ross Mechanical, Inc. |
1:2010cv08069 |
December 20, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Cook |
Amy J. St. Eve |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1131 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Amy J. St. Eve on 6/15/2012: The Court grants Plaintiffs' motion for turnover against Aundre Ross 43 in the amount of $12,758.68. The Court takes the remainder of the turnover request, as well as Mr. Ross' request for setoff, under advisement pending an evidentiary hearing set for 7/25/12 at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall file a joint witness and exhibit list by 7/10/12. With regard to setoff, Mr. Ross shall file a statement of claim by 6/22/12. Plaintiffs shall respond by 6/29/12. Plaintiffs' request for the entry of judgment against Mr. Ross is denied without prejudice. The turnover order against Mr. Ross in the amount of $12,758.68 is stayed pending resolution of the issues at the evidentiary hearing. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice(kef, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.