Chicago Title & Land Trust Co. v. Rabin et al
| Zafar Sheikh |
| William Schoenwald, Michael Lickerman, Joel Kagan, Odeh Orbach, David Rabin, Debbie Rabin, Hedy Berrocal, Daniel Kolleng and Luke Migala |
| 1:2011cv00425 |
| January 20, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1985 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 11/9/2012. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 1/30/2012. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
|
Filing
62
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 8/3/2011: Plaintiff's motion for default judgment against Defendant Orbach 48 is denied without prejudice; however the Court concludes that service on Defendant Orbach was proper. D efendant Orbach is given until 9/6/11 to file an appearance in this matter and to answer or otherwise plead. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to mail a copy of this order along with a copy of the amended complaint 24 to Defendant Oded Orbach, Prisoner No. 65031-054, at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), P.O. Box 329002, Brooklyn NY 11232. For further detail see written opinion). Mailed notice(smm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
