Jackson-Bey v. Gomez
| Ron Flemming, Larry M Banks, Clifton Jackson, Fred Rogers and Kenneth Anthony Green |
| John Doe, Director Gordeniz and Tom Dart |
| 1:2011cv00917 |
| February 9, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| Cook |
| Matthew F. Kennelly |
| Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 9/26/2011. Plaintiff Clifton Jackson Bey's motion to reinstate civil suit 13 is granted. Mr. Jackson Bey's third amended complaint 14 is accepted. The Clerk is directed to reinstate the case. The Clerk is also directed to: (1) terminate previous plaintiffs Ron Flemming and Fred Rogers; (2) terminate previously-named defendants John Doe, Director Gordinez, Tom Dart, and Psych Worker Young; and (3) terminate newly-named defendant Superintendent Bryant. The Clerk shall also: (1) issue summons for service of Mr. Jackson Bey's third amended complaint 14 on defendant Gomez; (2) attach a Magistrate Judge Consent Form to the summons for defendant; (3) send plaintiff said Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order; and (4) revise the caption in this matter to Clifton Jackson-Bey vs. Psychologist Gomez. [For further detail see written opinion.] Mailed notice (lw, ).
|
|
Filing
7
WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Matthew F. Kennelly on 4/4/2011. The complaint in this case was by five plaintiffs. The Court enters and continues the motions of Ron Flemming, Clifton Jackson, and Fred Rogers to proceed in forma pauperis (i. f.p.) 3 , 6 , 5 . The Court denies Larry M. Banks' motion to proceed i.f.p. 4 . Banks must pay the full filing fee within 30 days of this order if he wishes to remain as a plaintiff in this case. The remaining plaintiff, Kenneth Anthony Gree n, Jr., must either file an i.f.p. application on the proper form with the information required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) or pay the full filing fee if he wishes to remain as a plaintiff in this case. The Court dismisses the complaint for failur e to state a claim, with leave to file an amended complaint on or before May 5, 2011. The Clerk is directed to send plaintiff Green an i.f.p. application. The Clerk is directed to send each plaintiff a copy of this order and an amended complaint form with instructions. Each plaintiff shall have until May 5, 2011 to advise the Court whether he wishes to remain as a plaintiff in this group lawsuit. If, by that date, any plaintiff advises the Court that he does not wish to remain as a plaintiff in this case, he will be dismissed from the lawsuit and will not be charged a filing fee. Any plaintiff who does not respond by May 5, 2011 will be considered as a plaintiff in this lawsuit. The Court will then review any amended complaint that has been filed, and each plaintiff who still a party to this case will be accountable for the consequences described below. Plaintiffs' failure to submit an amended complaint will result in dismissal of this case. on the understanding that they do not wish to proceed with this case in federal court at this time. [For further details see minute order.] Mailed notice (lw, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
