Berman, et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
Ronald Berman and Gail Berman |
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp. |
1:2011cv01309 |
February 24, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
Chicago Office |
Lake |
William T. Hart |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 79 Opinion and Order: Plaintiffs' and defendant's motions in limine are granted in part and denied in part. Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 2/3/2014.Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Filing 66 Opinion and Order: Defendants' motion to strike 50 is denied. Defendants' motions to exclude testimony and for summary judgment [47, 48] are granted in part and denied in part. Dr. Ngai's testimony regarding manufacturing controls is excluded absent the presentation of a sufficient foundation. The claims against defendant Stryker Corporation are dismissed and defendant Stryker Corporation is dismissed from this action. In open court on October 24, 2013 at 2:00 p.m., the par ties shall submit a judge's copy of a final pretrial order in full compliance with Local Rule 16.1 and Local Rule Form 16.1.1, including trial briefs, proposed voir dire questions, motions in limine with supporting briefs, and proposed jury instructions. Signed by the Honorable William T. Hart on 9/24/2013:Mailed notice(clw, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.