Drewry et al v. Keltz
| Jacob Page Drewry and Anna Downey |
| Marshall Keltz |
| 1:2011cv01323 |
| February 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois |
| Chicago Office |
| XX US, Outside the State of IL |
| Robert M. Dow |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs' motion for injunctive relief and accounting 33 is granted. Within 30 days, Marshall Keltz shall provide to Plaintiffs an accounting of his receipts and disbursements on be half of the Trust and a statement of Trust assets from October 19, 2009 to the present. Keltz has not requested that Plaintiffs be required to post bond pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(c), and the Court finds that no bond is required because Keltz ha s not identified any harm if he were wrongly required to provide an accounting. This matter is set for a status hearing on 4/16/2013 at 09:00 AM. for the parties to advise the Court on the status of Keltz's compliance with this order and to discuss whether any further proceedings are necessary. Signed by the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin on 3/6/2013:Mailed notice(srn, )
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Robert M. Dow, Jr on 1/31/2012. Mailed notice(tbk, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
