McKinney v. Moutesdeoca et al

McKinney v. Moutesdeoca et al

Plaintiff:	Rodney T McKinney
Defendant:	Sqt. Richard Rochowicz and Joseph Moutesdeoca
Case Number:	1:2011cv01433
Filed:	March 1, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Lee
Presiding Judge:	Blanche M. Manning
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 6, 2012	Filing 71 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 12/6/2012:Mailed notice(tlp, )
April 14, 2011	Filing 4 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 4/14/2011: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The court authorizes Dixon Correctional Center trust fund officials to deduct $9.10 as an initi al partial filing fee and to continue making deductions from Plaintiff's trust fund account in accordance with this order. The clerk shall issue summonses for service of the complaint through the U.S. Marshal's Service on Chicago Police Off icer Joseph Moutesdeoca (#11370) and Sergeant Rochowicz (#1900). The Chicago Police Department is dismissed as a Defendant. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order. (For further details see written opinion.) Mailed notice (ma, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 6, 2012

Filing 71 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 12/6/2012:Mailed notice(tlp, )

April 14, 2011

Filing 4 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Blanche M. Manning on 4/14/2011: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file in forma pauperis 3 is granted. The court authorizes Dixon Correctional Center trust fund officials to deduct $9.10 as an initi al partial filing fee and to continue making deductions from Plaintiff's trust fund account in accordance with this order. The clerk shall issue summonses for service of the complaint through the U.S. Marshal's Service on Chicago Police Off icer Joseph Moutesdeoca (#11370) and Sergeant Rochowicz (#1900). The Chicago Police Department is dismissed as a Defendant. The clerk shall send Plaintiff a Magistrate Judge Consent Form and Instructions for Submitting Documents along with a copy of this order. (For further details see written opinion.) Mailed notice (ma, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McKinney v. Moutesdeoca et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Sqt. Richard Rochowicz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph Moutesdeoca
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney T McKinney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?