Nitz v. Anglin et al

Nitz v. Anglin et al

Petitioner:	Herman L Nitz, Jr
Respondent:	Keith O. Anglin
Case Number:	1:2011cv01904
Filed:	March 15, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
Office:	Chicago Office
County:	Vermilion
Presiding Judge:	Rebecca R. Pallmeyer
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 4, 2014	Filing 50 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/4/2014. Mailed notice(meg, )
July 12, 2011	Filing 19 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/12/2011. Respondent's motion to dismiss 10 is granted in part and denied in part without prejudice; Petitioner's motion to oppose that motion 14 is denied. Petitioner& #039;s request for leave to respond 18 is granted. His motion to voluntarily withdraw 15 is granted as follows: Petitioner is directed to advise the court within twenty-one days whether he wishes to: (a) drop his non-exhausted claims and proceed only on his claim that the sentence imposed violated the Eighth Amendment, or (b) have this case stayed pending complete exhaustion of state court remedies as to all claims raised in his federal habeas petition. If Petitioner should decide to abandon his non-exhausted claims and proceed with this case, he must submit an amended habeas petition (plus a judge's copy). [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice(ca, ).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 4, 2014

Filing 50 MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order. Signed by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 3/4/2014. Mailed notice(meg, )

July 12, 2011

Filing 19 WRITTEN Opinion entered by the Honorable Rebecca R. Pallmeyer on 7/12/2011. Respondent's motion to dismiss 10 is granted in part and denied in part without prejudice; Petitioner's motion to oppose that motion 14 is denied. Petitioner& #039;s request for leave to respond 18 is granted. His motion to voluntarily withdraw 15 is granted as follows: Petitioner is directed to advise the court within twenty-one days whether he wishes to: (a) drop his non-exhausted claims and proceed only on his claim that the sentence imposed violated the Eighth Amendment, or (b) have this case stayed pending complete exhaustion of state court remedies as to all claims raised in his federal habeas petition. If Petitioner should decide to abandon his non-exhausted claims and proceed with this case, he must submit an amended habeas petition (plus a judge's copy). [For further details see written opinion.] Mailed notice(ca, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nitz v. Anglin et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Keith O. Anglin
Represented By:	Katherine D. Saunders
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Herman L Nitz, Jr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?